Church / Culture / Sports / January 18, 2013

Admit it!

From my weekly article at

Zero. That’s the number of players elected to the Baseball Hall of Fame last week—and not for lack of qualification and impressive resumes. The reason was cheating, or more accurately the suspicion of cheating. There was such a pervasive misgiving and uncertainty about which former players might have used performance-enhancing drugs that the 569 voters couldn’t agree on even one eligible player. Therefore, legends like Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, and Sammy Sosa will not join the hallowed ranks of Cy Young, Willie Mays, and Joe DiMaggio—at least not this year.

photo credit: kwc via photopin cc

The plea to these suspected cheaters is “admit it!” We demand that they come clean and honestly air their wrongdoing for all to see. Often, though, we believe this will clear the air and remove tension. But think of those athletes who have admitted to cheating. In 2010, former baseball slugger Mark McGwire, behemoth of a man with Popeye-shaped forearms, publicly admitted to steroid use during his career. And just this week cyclist Lance Armstrong finally admitted to doping during his incredible run of seven Tour de France titles. These men did as we asked, but what did it gain them to “come clean”?

. . . 

Our society doesn’t respond positively to “coming clean,” no matter what is implied about relieving tension or clearing the air. The court of public opinion doesn’t offer plea bargains or leniency for cooperation with the prosecution. 

Read the full article HERE. 


Jan 18, 2013

This comment has been removed by the author.

Jan 18, 2013

I tried to comment before and my name came up as a blog I made for my kids’ class. Weird. Trying again.

I don’t really have a beef with your main point. I generally agree. But I don’t think either of these guys have “come clean.” McGwire says he could have hit the homers without the drugs, that they were only taken for health…not strength. That’s clean? Lance is still in the middle of it, so far seems still unresponsive about how much he’s damaged the lives of others. He admits to drugs when the statute of limitations for criminal things is up, but not for the nearer years even when there is evidence of doping there as well. I don’t see him as coming clean yet. I think they are admitting (these two, at least) what they must in order to move on. What if they came Zacchaeus clean? Reparations, etc. So few really come clean it’s hard for me to say how the culture would respond.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *