![]() |
| photo credit: Caucas' via photopin cc |
It wasn’t until later that I realized that just because time
is measurable doesn’t make it a good measure of quality. There are too many variables
in how a person creates and prepares for time to be of much significance.
People work at different paces. Some read fast and some read
slow. Some process at lightning speed and some sort through all ideas methodically.
My three hours might equal your seven or your seven might be much more complete
and thorough than my three.
Methods and styles vary wildly too. Many people are
systematic, laying out their project in detail before starting. Others are
process-as-they go types. Usually the more detailed approach takes longer, but
on occasion processing as one goes can lead right into a tangle of confusion
that takes forever to get out of. Some people are build it brick-by-brick types
and others creates in big, broad pieces. Which is faster? Which is better? It
depends.
One of the trickiest pieces of the whole time measurement confusion
is the differing measures people use for time. When it takes someone two years to write
a book they weren’t writing for two straight years. Periods of thought,
busyness, writer’s block, and distraction were the majority of that time. When
someone says it took them 7 hours to write a paper it probably means they sat
at their desk for seven hours. If I have had an idea brewing in my mind for
weeks and I write it in 45 minutes how long did I spend on that piece? I don’t
know – somewhere between 45 minutes and a fortnight.
We ought to feel free from the measurement of time when it
comes to creative and communicative endeavors. We use time to be creative, but
time isn’t a gauge of how creative or effective we are. Write ‘til your piece
is good, prepare until your lesson is clear, and pay no mind to how long it
takes someone else to do the same.
